Search for: "Matter of Kaufman v Kaufman" Results 1 - 20 of 192
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Lundgren v Kaufman Astoria Studios, 261 AD2d 513, the Appellate Division noted that "Generally, where a collective bargaining agreement containing a grievance and arbitration procedure ... a covered employee may not sue his or her employer directly for breach of the agreement, but must proceed through the union in accordance with the contract. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Lundgren v Kaufman Astoria Studios, 261 AD2d 513, the Appellate Division noted that "Generally, where a collective bargaining agreement containing a grievance and arbitration procedure ... a covered employee may not sue his or her employer directly for breach of the agreement, but must proceed through the union in accordance with the contract. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
In fact, such conduct is strictly forbidden for federal officials under the Hatch Act and as a matter of Justice Department policy. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 9:16 am by Daniel Gilman
Given the Supreme Court’s recent articulation of the major questions doctrine in West Virginia v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:19 am by Emma Snell
  The U.S. is expected to issue new sanctions this week against law enforcement officials and those directly involved in the crackdown on protests in Iran, a source familiar with the matter has said. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 3:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Kaufman v Boies Schiller Flexner LLP2022 NY Slip Op 32743(U)  August 15, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: Index No. 154149/2018  Judge: James d’Auguste is the very fraught story of a massively fought matrimonial action. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the proposed supplement to the complaint seeking to add a cause of action under Judiciary Law § 487 was “patently devoid of merit” (McIntosh v Ronit Realty, LLC, 181 AD3d 579, 580; see Kaufman v Moritt Hock & Hamroff, LLP, 192 AD3d 1092, 1092-1093). [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:29 am by Peter J. Sluka
  While this pre-suit demand requirement is not quite as rigorous as the pre-suit demand requirement for derivative actions (see Kaufman v Cohen, 307 AD2d 113 [1st Dept 2003]), at least a general allegation of a prior demand and refusal is required. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 8:10 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
Pennsylvania Superior Court Recognizes Employees’ Right to Sue Employers Under the Medical Marijuana Act By Greg Hyman and Eileen Ficaro In a matter of first impression, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, in Scranton Quincy Clinic Company, LLC, et al. v. [read post]