Search for: "Matter of Murphy v City of NY" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Jordan Steinberg
The daughter and her husband had purchased a very high-end Murphy bed/library modular furniture from Resource Furniture in New York City. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am by MOTP
Comment: While the new rule makes good sense as a matter of jurisprudential policy, it also happens to cut both ways (shortening or lengthening the limitations period depending on the nature of the claim and under what theory it is actionable). [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Claiming absolute privilege or qualified privilege as a defense in litigation involving alleged defamatory statementsSpring v County of Monroe, 2019 NY Slip Op 00747, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentThe relevant facts in this action were not in dispute. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Claiming absolute privilege or qualified privilege as a defense in litigation involving alleged defamatory statementsSpring v County of Monroe, 2019 NY Slip Op 00747, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentThe relevant facts in this action were not in dispute. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Transactional lawyers who assist clients in the formation and restructuring of business entities, and the litigators who clean up the transactional lawyers’ occasional messes, each have lessons to learn from last week’s appellate ruling in 223 Sam, LLC v 223 15th Street, LLC, 2018 NY Slip Op 03118 [2d Dept May 2, 2018]. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 7:59 am by William Ford
City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010). [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
” Further, such an individual may be found to be disqualified for unemployment insurance benefits.Further, the decision in Blair suggests that a court could deem a retirement to be the equivalent of a resignation for the purposes of 4 NYCRR 5.3(b).* Blair v Horn, 2008 NY Slip Op 32581(U)[Not selected for publication in the Official Reports], is posted on the Internet at: http://www.leagle.com/decision/In%20NYCO%2020080929167/IN%20THE%20MATTER%20OF%20BLAIR%20v.%20HORN** For… [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 1:53 pm
In so holding, it is noted that any request for relief on the ground that the Legislature intended to provide better protection for EMTs who are injured in the line of duty would be better addressed by the Legislature. ( See Matter of Lidakis v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Schindler v Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer, LLP ; 2011 NY Slip Op 31519(U); Supreme Court, New York County; Docket Number: 115967/2010; Judge: Judith J. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:43 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The affidavit of the plaintiff's process server constitutes prima facie evidence of proper service (see Matter of Perskin v Bassaragh, 73 AD3d 1073; Prospect Park Mgt., LLC v Beatty, 73 AD3d 885; Pezolano v Incorporated City of Glen Cove, 71 AD3d 970, 971; Cavalry Portfolio Servs., LLC v Reisman, 55 AD3d 524, 525; Jefferson v Netusil, 44 AD3d 621). [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am by Rob Robinson
Georgetown Law Rolls Out the ‘Law Firm Pronunciation Guide - bit.ly/KoaqON (Bruce Carton) Global Aerospace Inc. v. [read post]