Search for: "Matter of Principe v New York State Educ. Dept."
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Lack of prior misconduct not sufficient to mitigate imposing the penalty of dismissal given the fraudulent nature of the individual’s misconductRonga v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2016 NY Slip Op 02921, Appellate Division, First DepartmentIn an earlier decision, Ronga v New York City Department of Education, 114 AD3d 527, the Appellate Division sustained the findings of the Disciplinary Hearing Officer that… [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 12:26 pm
The employer's failure to reply to a request to withdraw a resignation otherwise permitted by its Regulations is arbitrary and an abuse of discretion Matter of Mendez v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2010 NY Slip Op 30889(U), April 9, 2010, Supreme Court, New York County, Judge Jane S. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:34 pm
Assn. v State of New York, 75 NY2d 175, 186; Matter of Trupiano v Board of Educ. of E. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:34 pm
Assn. v State of New York, 75 NY2d 175, 186; Matter of Trupiano v Board of Educ. of E. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
I will not accept materials that raise new issues and introduce new exhibits that are not relevant to the claims originally raised in the appeal (Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeals of Gonzalez, 48 id. 405, Decision No. 15,898). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
I will not accept materials that raise new issues and introduce new exhibits that are not relevant to the claims originally raised in the appeal (Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeals of Gonzalez, 48 id. 405, Decision No. 15,898). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
I will not accept materials that raise new issues and introduce new exhibits that are not relevant to the claims originally raised in the appeal (Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeals of Gonzalez, 48 id. 405, Decision No. 15,898). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
I will not accept materials that raise new issues and introduce new exhibits that are not relevant to the claims originally raised in the appeal (Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeals of Gonzalez, 48 id. 405, Decision No. 15,898). [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:00 am
Dist. of the City of N.Y., 125 AD3d 484 [1st Dept 2015]; Matter of Brown v City of New York, 111 AD3d 426 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 8:33 am
" Law Research Serv., Inc. v Crook, 36 AD2d 912, 912 (1st Dept 1971)(no long-arm jurisdiction over out-of-state attorney whose only connection to the state is that he hired New York attorney to represent his client in a Texas proceeding).This situation is markedly different from other cases finding jurisdiction based on the engagement of a New York lawyer or law firm by an out-of-state entity. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
School Dist. v New York State Pub. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
School Dist. v New York State Pub. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
The seminal case in New York Stateregarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Reilly, Esq., attorneys for amicus curiae New York State United Teachers, Christina M. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Reilly, Esq., attorneys for amicus curiae New York State United Teachers, Christina M. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:00 am
However, the Court of Appeals instructs that FOIL is to be "liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly interpreted so that the public is granted maximum access to the records of government" (Matter of Town of Waterford v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:00 am
This, said the Commissioner, appeared to be a question of first impression and neither party has cited to a prior decision that squarely addresses this issue nor could the Commissioner find one.Although Minisink cited Matter of Kelley, 19 Ed Dept Rep 499, aff’d sub. nom.; Kelley v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:00 am
New York City Dept. of Bldgs., 107 A.D.3d 632, 968 N.Y.S.2d 76 [1st Dept 2013] [respondents arbitrarily concluded that petitioner's convictions of mail fraud and money laundering bore a direct relationship to the duties and responsibilities attendant to a stationary engineer]; compare with Matter of Bonaventure v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
The seminal case in New York State regarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]