Search for: "Matter of State of New York v Howard H." Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State actors are the State of New York, Governor of the State of New York, the New York State Board of Regents, the New York State Education Department, and the New York State Commissioner of Education (collectively the State). [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State actors are the State of New York, Governor of the State of New York, the New York State Board of Regents, the New York State Education Department, and the New York State Commissioner of Education (collectively the State). [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702… [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am by Bill Henderson
But in this case, because of the subject matter, they are all white men. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
See Note 44, ante (warning against broad liability schemes that would encourage landlords to act as law enforcement).[15] The New York intermediate appellate court took a similar view in Gill v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am by ernst
  When none arrived, she accepted the offer of a retainer by a recently created holding company, Aviation Corporation (AVCO), assembled from scores of small carriers by two great New York investment banks. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm by Chuck Cosson
This understanding of human nature makes itself known in both privacy and data security matters. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am by Jed Handelsman Shugerman
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm by admin
This paper presents a survey of federal and state court decisions on these two questions, hoping to offer some guidance to practitioners. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am by Dan Carvajal
But if policymakers wish to reform existing limitation regimes, or to seek alternatives, they must first recognize the circumstances under which they have been adopted and to acknowledge that, irrespective of whether the limitations are desirable as a matter of public policy, their appeal is eminently understandable. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
Contrast that with the approach of the New York Metropolitan Museum of Art which recently made the images of it's artworks in the public domain freely available through a new open access policy, without restrictions. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
Miller, New York City, for petitioners. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am by Marty Lederman
Ali’s civil suit against the New York State Athletic Commission While Ali’s criminal appeal was pending, he decided to sue the New York State Athletic Commission, alleging that it had unconstitutionally suspended his boxing license. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The “tariff” that so upsets the majority arises from the fact that the Maryland-income-only resident will pay 3.2 percent of $1,000,000 ($32,000) in taxes to Howard County and nothing to any other state, whereas the other resident will pay the same $32,000 plus whatever amount New York State levies on $200,000 of income earned in New York. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
Massachusetts is one of the several states that bans stun guns (including Tasers) — the others are Hawaii, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin, plus the Annapolis/Baltimore area in Maryland, New Orleans, Washington, D.C., and several other cities. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
  This is a perspective that also conflates public and private law views of entities, be they states or corporations. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am by Will Baude
The Federalist states flatly that under the Clause the President must make the appointment “during the recess. [read post]