Search for: "Matter of Town of Waterford v New York State Dept. of Envtl. Conservation"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
The Court affirmed the lower courts' rulings.Citing Public Officers Law §87[2][a] and Matter of Town of Waterford v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
The Court affirmed the lower courts' rulings.Citing Public Officers Law §87[2][a] and Matter of Town of Waterford v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:00 am
Citing Public Officers Law §87[2][g], and Matter of Town of Waterford v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:00 am
Citing Public Officers Law §87[2][g], and Matter of Town of Waterford v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:00 am
However, the Court of Appeals instructs that FOIL is to be "liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly interpreted so that the public is granted maximum access to the records of government" (Matter of Town of Waterford v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 8:04 am
"Exemptions are to be narrowly construed to provide maximum access, and the agency seeking to prevent disclosure carries the burden of demonstrating that the requested material falls squarely within a FOIL exemption" (Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, 566 [1986] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Town of Waterford v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]