Search for: "Matter of Valenti v Valenti"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2022, 3:35 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 1:38 pm
Valenti). [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm
As a result, the case does not directly address the question now presented—whether a legislature’s prescribed timeline can be judicially overridden.Perhaps the most directly relevant case is Valenti v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 2:37 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:41 am
Valenti. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 7:07 am
Like many people who favor censorship but have a cookie-sheet-shallow grasp of its history, Valenti is misquoting Oliver Wendell Holmes dropping a rhetorical aside in Schenck v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 8:17 am
Calibrating remedies to bargaining/penalizing those who reject early bargains—opposed to that as a policy matter. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:00 am
But that procedural matter struck me as a bit too inside-baseball to blog about, especially since I knew that this brief was forthcoming. [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:21 am
” Authors Matthew Valenti and Christa Maiorano, along with editor Dan Rosales, earned the runner-up prize for their work on Wellness Int’l Network v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:30 am
As the Appellate Division held in Mendez v Valenti, 101 AD2d 612, as long as the termination of a probationer [in the classified service] is effected within a reasonable time, such as set to coincide with the end of the next payroll period, the courts will not deem the probationer to have obtained tenure by estoppel because of his or her continuation on the payroll following the last day of his or her probationary period.Stated another way, the appointing authority has until… [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 8:29 am
Kolodin v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
***The Appellate Division remanded the matter to Supreme Court for its determination as to which was the “official” effective date of Mallon’s promotion to Sergeant.* In Vetter v Board of Educ., Ravena-Coeymans-Selkirk Cent. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:57 pm
Needs no reminder about Jack Valenti. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 1:00 pm
Because if we think about 10 years ago v. today there’s been extraordinary progress. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am
A: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) ____ Q: What is the subject matter of 17 USC 119? [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 3:03 pm
Jack Valenti was an instrumentalist.A: agenda will differ depending on audience, but it still matters how the arguments are made. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:25 am
** See, also, Matter of Brown v Board of Educ. of the Mahopac Cent. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
UK judge declines Samsung's job offer, invalidates three 3G standard-essential patents in Apple case
7 Mar 2013, 5:21 am
EP1005726 on a "turbo encoding/decoding device and method for processing frame data according to QoS":Justice Floyd determined that this patent "a) is not entitled to the priority claimed, and is therefore invalid based on Samsung's admission, b) if entitled to priority, would nevertheless have been invalid for obviousness over both Bömer and Valenti, c) if valid, would have been infringed by Apple's UMTS compliant devices." [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 7:48 am
In Valenti v. [read post]
