Search for: "McDonald v. Doe" Results 1 - 20 of 1,254
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2024, 5:11 am by Michael Oykhman
For example, the court in a case known as R v Patrick, 2007 CanLII 7579 (ONSC), noted that “carrying does not require personal possession”. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:05 pm by William McDonald
Markham notes that, under the major questions doctrine, articulated last year by the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Nov 21, 2023 | Does Industry Self-Regulation of Mental Health Apps Protect Consumers? [read post]
19 May 2024, 11:28 am by Ilya Somin
" The Supreme Court of Indiana recently reiterated that rule in its February decision in Spells v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:06 am by Kevin LaCroix
The AI-related hook does not make this case itself an “AI-related” case, and I have not counted it as such. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 4:53 pm by Alexandra Shields
  Recent Federal Court jurisprudence The recent decision of Justice Lee in Elliott-Carde v McDonald’s Australia Limited (Stay Application) [2023] FCA 1210 (McDonald’s) and his Honour’s comments in Transport Workers Union of Australia v Qantas Airways Limited (NSD1309/2020) have clarified that proceedings under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Fair Work Act) do not preclude class action proceedings under Part IVA of the Federal Court… [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Let me conclude by addressing the proverbial elephant that shows up in any room where a regulator like me is speaking to those working in compliance: when does the Enforcement Division recommend charges against a compliance officer? [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 9:59 am by Russell Knight
Whether it is McDonald’s, Jiffy Lubes or Verizon stores, Americans love a trusted brand. [read post]