Search for: "McDonald v. State of California"
Results 1 - 20
of 358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Aug 29, 2023 | Could West Virginia v EPA Strengthen State Climate Laws | Scholars argue that a recent Supreme Court decision may bolster state climate lawsuits. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:37 am
And don’t get me started on the Reasonably Scared Cop Rule of Graham v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm
Mark Graber disputes the significance of the latest discovery of Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman related to whether the President is an Office of the United States for purposes of Section 3 of the fourteenth Amendment (Balkinization).ICYMI: The failed attempt to rename Brown v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:15 am
Recently, I took note of the fact that the California Supreme Court as granted review of EpicentRx, In.c v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 5:00 pm
Retirements -- Several Ombuds announced their retirements last year, including:Jim Augustine, University of South CarolinaPaul Kuerbis, Colorado CollegeCraig Mousin, DePaul UniversityMerle Waxman, Yale University (2022) In Memoriam -- Colleagues remembered many Ombuds, including a beloved current and upcoming Ombuds, who passed away in 2023: Mary Childers, retired inaugural Ombuds at Dartmouth CollegeJanet Eckhouse, retired Health Care Ombuds Mediator at Kaiser PermanenteCurtis Grassman, retired… [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 6:38 am
Cal.) in McDonald v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 1:00 am
Miramon v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 1:00 am
Miramon v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 1:00 am
Miramon v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am
(Please note that these figures do not include state court securities class action lawsuit filings.) [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 7:04 pm
And then there was Otis McDonald v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:13 pm
v=YZcyMgdWmPg. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 12:22 pm
The appeals court in McDonald v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 7:28 pm
That was the first state law noted by the Supreme Court in McDonald v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:42 am
Judge Shubb called the state’s definition of misinformation (“false information that is contradicted by contemporary scientific consensus”) “nonsense” and ruled in favor of the injunction on the grounds that the vagueness of the law would violate doctors’ 14th Amendment right to due process.The state has decided not to appeal Shubb’s decision, but the ultimate fate of the law is still in limbo, in part due to an ongoing separate lawsuit… [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
McDonald v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 5:30 am
State; and Tennessee in Planned Parenthood of Middle Tennessee et al. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 2:54 am
Cal.) in McDonald v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 12:15 am
McDonald v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 7:54 pm
Heller (2008) and in McDonald v. [read post]
