Search for: "McKinney v. Employment Division"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2024, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division essentially inverted Seymour's "nexus" standard by requiring the Board to come forward with evidence of a nexus to employment. [read post]
23 May 2024, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division essentially inverted Seymour's "nexus" standard by requiring the Board to come forward with evidence of a nexus to employment. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 6:13 am
See Colyer v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am
Law § 624 (McKinney). [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 6:40 am
The recent case of Lipsky v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
In other words, the moratorium statute does not permit an employer to whom the statute applies to provide retirees with lesser health insurance benefits than active employees'" (Matter of Altic v Board of Educ., 142 AD3d 1311, 1312, quoting Matter of Anderson v Niagara Falls City Sch. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
In other words, the moratorium statute does not permit an employer to whom the statute applies to provide retirees with lesser health insurance benefits than active employees'" (Matter of Altic v Board of Educ., 142 AD3d 1311, 1312, quoting Matter of Anderson v Niagara Falls City Sch. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
In other words, the moratorium statute does not permit an employer to whom the statute applies to provide retirees with lesser health insurance benefits than active employees'" (Matter of Altic v Board of Educ., 142 AD3d 1311, 1312, quoting Matter of Anderson v Niagara Falls City Sch. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
In other words, the moratorium statute does not permit an employer to whom the statute applies to provide retirees with lesser health insurance benefits than active employees'" (Matter of Altic v Board of Educ., 142 AD3d 1311, 1312, quoting Matter of Anderson v Niagara Falls City Sch. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
School Dist., 21 AD3d 1134, quoting Assembly Memorandum in Support of Bill, 1996 McKinney's Session Laws of New York at 2050. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
School Dist., 21 AD3d 1134, quoting Assembly Memorandum in Support of Bill, 1996 McKinney's Session Laws of New York at 2050. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am
School Dist., 21 AD3d 1134, quoting Assembly Memorandum in Support of Bill, 1996 McKinney's Session Laws of New York at 2050. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am
School Dist., 21 AD3d 1134, quoting Assembly Memorandum in Support of Bill, 1996 McKinney's Session Laws of New York at 2050. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
The loan/bonus proportionately transformed into debt when the husband left his employment prior to December 2021. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 3:40 am
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse worries about “the growing threat that an increasingly weaponized free-exercise clause poses to civil society,” particularly now that the court has agreed to consider whether to “overturn a 30-year-old decision, Employment Division v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 1:11 pm
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has the most merits amicus filings with 86, followed by June Medical Services LLC v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:00 am
Correspondence exchanged between public officers and agencies and private consultants are within the ambit of the Freedom of Information LawRauh v de Blasio, 2018 NY Slip Op 03115, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe editor of NYPPL has consistently opined that:1. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am
McKinney School of Law, Controlling Health Care Spending: More Patient 'Skin in the Game? [read post]
