Search for: "Meanes v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 68,766
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm
The 6-3 decision, with the justices divided on ideological lines, means that the disputed district will remain a safe seat for Republicans, who hold a 6-1 advantage in the state’s congressional delegation. [read post]
23 May 2024, 11:21 am
Corbett v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:28 am
From Tuesday's decision in Robertson v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:27 am
The most efficient means of using the constitution to fight climate change, the panelists agreed, is turn to pushing for desired policy in congresses, local governments, and state constitutions. [read post]
23 May 2024, 3:01 am
Fisher v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 3:00 am
(Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times) Ryan King, a spokesman for the office of the University of California’s president, Michael V. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:00 pm
It’s true that CFPB v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:23 am
All it means, as Khan said in an interview Monday, is that “no people anywhere are saints. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:20 am
., LLC v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am
Lack of tree canopy, lack of air conditioning at home or work and inefficient infrastructure can also play a part, said V. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am
This entire talk was both inappropriate and terribly mean. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:15 am
What does this mean for future document access requests? [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Retirement Investors For purposes of the new test, the Final Rule has added a new definition for the recipients of investment advice: Term Definition Retirement Investor a plan, plan participant or beneficiary, IRA, IRA owner or beneficiary, plan fiduciary within the meaning of ERISA section (3)(21)(A)(i) or (iii) Code section 4975(e)(3)(A) or (C) with respect to the plan, or an IRA fiduciary within the meaning of Code section 4975(e)(3)(A) or (C) with respect to the IRA. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm
The United States Supreme Court has gone rogue. [read post]