Search for: "Metts v. US" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2016, 10:53 am by John Floyd
The use of the judge’s rubber stamped signature did not signify his active participation in the case. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
  Comments and suggestions (especially for compiling a useful student friendly reading list) gratefully received as this remains very much a work in progress. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:08 pm by admin
When expert witnesses rely upon one or a few studies, which telegraph internal validity, this litigation strategy may provide the strongest evidence against the study’s being reasonably relied upon, or its providing “sufficient facts and data” to support an admissible expert witness opinion. [1] Daubert v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
  My hope is that this exercise will provide an incentive to dig deep into both primary and secondary sources in a  useful way. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:24 am by Emma Snell
Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said: “Strong messages from the President and Prime Minister of Finland. [read post]