Search for: "Mike Framer"
Results 1 - 20
of 168
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
" (Kavanaugh here cites Mike Ramsey.) [read post]
29 May 2024, 4:00 am
As Mike discussed yesterday, the majority opinion of Justice Alito altered the governing law to make it much more difficult, but not impossible, for plaintiffs to bring racial redistricting claims. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
Professor Mike Ramsey observed that the clear statement rule, or the "presidential nonapplicability canon (if we can call it that) parallel a view of the major questions doctrine as a substantive canon. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
For that reason, the Tillman amicus brief cited Bostock in several places to respond to any arguments based on the absurdity doctrine: The Framers were not omniscient. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:52 pm
House Speaker Mike Johnson, who could lose only a few Republicans from his slim majority, said he personally spoke to the GOP holdouts acknowledging the “heavy, heavy” vote as he sought their support. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
[Justice Scalia erred because there are no “Officers of the United States” appointed outside Article II, Section II.] [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
Professor Will Baude (another former student of Akhil Amar) and Professor Mike Paulsen (Akhil Amar's former law school roommate) assert in their article that members of state legislatures do hold "office . . . under the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am
When the Framers designed the Constitution’s impeachment provisions, they made a conscious choice not to allow impeachment for mere “maladministration”—in other words, for incompetence, poor judgment, or bad policy. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
As Professor Cass Sunstein has written:The Court devotes essentially no attention to the original public meaning of the Due Process Clause, or to the original understanding of its framers and ratifiers. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 5:24 pm
[Speaker Mike Johnson was both right and wrong] Last month, House Speaker Mike Johnson caused a stir by stating in an interview that "the separation of church and state is a misnomer. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
In addition, a Speaker named Mike is long overdue. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 6:59 pm
" Daniel Webster's 1st edition of his Dictionary of American English, which had been published in 1828, and would have been authoritative to the Framers' of the Fourteenth Amendment, defines the word "insurrection" as follows: "INSURREC'TION, noun [Latin insurgo; in and surgo, to rise.] [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 3:53 pm
Lash's article responds to recent publications by Will Baude and Mike Paulsen, Mark Graber, Gerard Magliocca, and others. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 1:56 pm
Seth Tillman, Josh Blackman, and Mike Ramsey have argued that it doesn't really matter—that it's perfectly fine for this Marylander to represent California in the Senate. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 11:08 pm
Instead, Trump watched the riot unfold on television approvingly as the rioters called out "Hang, Mike Pence. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:50 am
The group made specific threats against both former Vice President Mike Pence and former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:34 am
The majority noted how state court judicial review under state constitutions was well known by the Constitution's framers and was part of the backdrop for the SCOTUS decision in Marbury v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:32 am
Mike wrote a thoughtful piece about the case yesterday. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 5:40 am
American politics is famously fraught, with observers going as far back as Alexis de Tocqueville noting its peculiar power to spur debates from country farmer to farmer, as much as from constitutional framer to framer. [read post]
