Search for: "Miranda v. Doe et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 64
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
Wells’ meta-analysis does not pass muster under Rule 702 because its methodology was unclear, inconsistently applied, not replicable, and at times transparently reverse-engineered.[18] The court’s evaluation of Wells was unflinchingly critical. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 4:51 pm
The CGFoE Prize for Excellence in Legal Services is awarded to the Human Rights and Indigenous Peoples Clinic at Suffolk University and the Association of Maya Lawyers and Notaries in Guatemala for their exceptional advocacy in the case of Maya Kaqchikel Indigenous Peoples of Sumpango et al. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 12:21 pm
KITREANA GRANT-VAN BROCKLIN, et al., Appellees. 3rd District. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 5:58 am
Thomas Grisso et al., Juveniles’ Competence to Stand Trial: A Comparison of Adolescents’ and Adults’ Capacities as Trial Defendants, 27 L. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:51 am
“In this legal malpractice action, plaintiff, defendants’ former client, contends that “but for” defendants’ negligence he would have obtained a favorable jury verdict in his underlying personal injury action against the owner and driver of a truck (Caso v Santos, et al. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
Khalid Shaikh Mohammad et al. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
They included the House Un-American Activities Committee and other McCarthyite organizations (including some within the Executive Branch); as well as the white men on the Alabama jury in New York Times v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 6:46 am
JDB v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 8:30 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 10:53 am
” The ACLU and lawyers for two military psychologists who helped develop the CIA’s post-9/11 enhanced interrogation program released a statement announcing a settlement today in Salim et al. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 12:34 pm
Thompson, et al., “Enhancing the ecological risk assessment process,” 4 Integrated Envt’l Assess. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:16 pm
Once this burden is discharged, if the record does in fact bear out that no genuine dispute exists, the burden then shifts to the non-moving party, who must set forth affirmative evidence and specific facts showing there is a genuine dispute on that issue. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
Amgen Inc., et al., No. 15-1039 (Does the notice requirement of the BPCIA create an effective six-month exclusivity post-FDA approval?) [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm
’s Office v. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 11:17 am
The United States District Court of the Northern District of Florida made a landmark decision in Brenner, et al. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
Mohammed et al. and brought us almost-live coverage of the subsequent motions hearing. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:43 pm
Cranor, “Milward v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:59 am
Hardwick (1986) to illustrate to readers how certiorari works, as well as internal drafts of opinions written in Miranda v. [read post]
