Search for: "Morris, Appeal of" Results 1 - 20 of 2,238
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2024, 6:42 am by Dan Bressler
” “The petitioner, Kelley Morris Salvatore, was appointed solicitor by the town’s mayor, with the Town Council’s approval. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Bolinas residents sent more than 2,500 “art” letters with personalized appeals asking U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 4:08 am by Beatrice Yahia
George Wright reports for BBC News; James Jordan and Harriet Morris report for AP News. [read post]
29 May 2024, 7:10 am by Holly
May 29, 2024 |  By: Triston O’Savio and Jennifer Morris   The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit recently issued a landmark decision that temporarily altered the standard of review for antitrust bid-rigging prosecutions against manufacturers and distributors in government contracts. [read post]
23 May 2024, 7:14 am by Class Action Defense
Duane Morris Takeaway: This week’s episode of the Class Action Weekly Wire features Duane Morris partner Jerry Maatman and associate Tyler Zmick with their discussion of significant appellate decisions issued by courts throughout 2023 and 2024. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Drug framing can involve lobbying, activism, and direct appeals to consumers through advertising, among other tactics; and the consequences of prevailing in these framing battles are considerable since the eventual drug regulation can lead to billions of dollars in profits for private companies or result in the incarceration of hundreds of thousands of people. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:17 am by Beatrice Yahia
Jennifer Hansler reports for CNN; Missy Ryan, Claire Parker, and Loveday Morris report for the Washington Post. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 10:24 am by Unknown
” With the court’s decision, barring a reversal on appeal, the ongoing dispute between the taxpayers and the Department of Revenue over this issue has fizzled out. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
The court found that Egilman had manipulated data to reach misleading conclusions, devoid of scientific validity.[5] Egilman was so distraught by being excluded that he sought to file a personal appeal to the United States Court of Appeal.[6] When the defendant-appellee opposed Egilman’s motion to intervene in the plaintiff’s appeal, Egilman stridently asserted his right to participate,[7] and filed his own declaration.[8] The declaration is required reading… [read post]