Search for: "Motor City Sales v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2022, 6:00 am by Christopher Tyner
  The superior court reversed the revocation on two grounds, finding that there was a lack of evidence that the appellee was operating a motor vehicle and also finding that the procedures of G.S. 20-16.2 deprived the appellee of due process. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am by MOTP
Unless appellate courts come up with some grandfathering doctrine to exempt claims that would not have been time-barred before the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Agar Corp. v Electro Circuits. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
In a recent decision from the Ontario Superior Court in Ottawa, Goulding v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:30 pm
Class action litigation was the superior method for adjudicating the claims, according to the court. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
City of Redondo Court: U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 06-56869, 06-55750 September 16, 2011 Judge: Smith Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Labor & Employment Law Day-laborer organizations challenged a city anti-solicitation ordinance that barred individuals from standing on a street or highway and soliciting, or attempting to solicit, business, or contributions from an occupant of any… [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
Orinda leaders were disappointed that none of the money would come back to the city for environmental projects. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:46 pm by Christopher Simon
The Superior Court, Floyd County, Walther, J., granted summary judgment to restaurant. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
That appeal was dismissed Monday after both sides reached a compromise that, in part, calls for the BLM to consider impacts to cultural, wildlife and other resources when reviewing new lease sales. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 5:49 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The Superior Court further stated that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has never considered whether its previous ruling on the issue still applies, given amendments have been made to the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law. [read post]