Search for: "Murphy v. DC DOES"
Results 1 - 20
of 39
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Although Willis, acting for Fulton County and the state of Georgia, has no power to grant Powell or Chesebro any kind of immunity against federal prosecution, pursuant to the SCOTUS decisions in Murphy v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 12:39 pm
Instead, again, they cite to Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:11 am
For example, the plaintiff in Bulun Bulun v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:22 am
Instead of full blog posts on each proposal, this post will take a snapshot of the craziness taking place in DC. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
The Flawed Application of a Generally Accepted Methodology If a meretricious expert witness by pretense or ignorance invokes a standard methodology but does so in a flawed or distorted, or in an invalid way, then there will be a clear break in the chain of inferences from data to conclusion. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 10:10 am
In its 1983 decision in the matter of INS v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:05 am
Nieves v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 7:59 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 1:46 pm
IRS does not collect comments or messages on this site. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm
” Ryan cited US v Bruce as standing for the proposition that “violation of an ethical obligation does not in and of itself give rise to a conflict of interest unless it involves the attorney putting his own interests in conflict with his client’s. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:01 am
David Meyer-Lindenberg crosses Ed Whelan, President of the Ethic and Public Policy Center and a leading conservative voice on Supreme Court nominees. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:36 pm
Tweets are my own. (51) @VLJeker – V. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
Murphy, both of NYU Law School. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am
However, Boldack v East Lindsay DC 31 HLR 41 held that Cavalier v Pope was binding authority unless it could be distinguished.The Claimant sought to argue for a duty of care, relying on Lips v Older [2005] PIQR P14, where a (1/3) duty had been found in respect of a tenant who had fallen off a low retaining wall into a lowered area. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am
However, Boldack v East Lindsay DC 31 HLR 41 held that Cavalier v Pope was binding authority unless it could be distinguished.The Claimant sought to argue for a duty of care, relying on Lips v Older [2005] PIQR P14, where a (1/3) duty had been found in respect of a tenant who had fallen off a low retaining wall into a lowered area. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:57 am
http://bit.ly/LPLQcg (Bob Ambrogi) Model Behavior: Federal and State Court Rules on eDiscovery - - http://bit.ly/Mk6eHa (Jessica Mederson) Phase 2 of Discovery Pilot Provides Glimpse into Future of eDiscovery – - http://bit.ly/Oxc1V6 (BLLAWG) Robots Are Not Replacing eDiscovery Lawyers - http://bit.ly/MkKifa (Jason Krause) Rules for eDiscovery Vendors in D.C.: Taking A Step Back - http://bit.ly/Lt2hP4 (Cynthia Courtney)… [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:47 pm
Petition Seeking Review of 3rd Circuit’s eDiscovery Decision – http://bit.ly/Qsibsl (Nicholas Wagoner) Consider Retaining a Special Master – http://bit.ly/LkSash (Matthew Prewitt) Day One of a Predictive Coding Narrative: Searching for Relevance in the Ashes of Enron – http://bit.ly/LKKaDq (Ralph Losey) DC Bar Opinion: Non–Lawyer Ownership of Discovery Service Vendors – http://bit.ly/LJKrsm (DC Bar) Debunking the Seven Biggest Myths of Predictive… [read post]
13 May 2012, 4:46 pm
[Link] Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton is looking doe a mid-level associate with a CS or EE degree to work at their Palo Alto office. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am
Federal Court - bit.ly/IJr90K (Mark Hamblett) Peck Predictive Coding Opinion Upheld: Does Anyone Remember What This Case Is Actually About? [read post]
