Search for: "N. L. R. B. v. Atlantic International Corp" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Justice L’Heureux-Dubé invokes his name in the Supreme Court of Canada’s R. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am by Kelly
(PatLit) Judgment of similarity of designs in China (Class 99) Denmark When toilet seats make impressions on their users: Duravit AG v B&N Developing ApS (Class 99) Europe European patent – Further steps to enhanced cooperation (EPLAW) (IPJUR) (IPKat) (inovia) (IAM) General Court: More absolute grounds: KOMPRESSOR PLUS (Class 46) General Court confirms likelihood of confusion: Bianchin v OHMI – Grotto (GASOLINE) (Class 46) General Court finds… [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Quincy, MA; Michael Foster, President) B&L Industries, Inc. [read post]