Search for: "National Labor Relations Board, The"
Results 1 - 20
of 8,557
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2024, 2:58 am
Meanwhile, dozens of the terminated employees have filed charges with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), saying the terminations were for a “peaceful, non-disruptive protest that was directly and explicitly connected to their terms and conditions of work. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 1:24 pm
In May 2023, the NLRB GC espoused the view that such agreements violate the NLRA, and we now have the first decision from an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) confirming the GC’s view, setting up a potential decision by the National Labor Relations Board. [read post]
Your non-competes and non-solicits may violate ANOTHER federal law: the National Labor Relations Act
24 Jun 2024, 4:45 am
Earlier this month, a National Labor Relations Board Administrative Law Judge ruled that a non-union employer violated the National Labor Relations Act by utilizing unlawful noncompete and nonsolicitation provisions in employment agreements. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 10:21 am
The Supreme Court of the United States recently unanimously ruled against the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:43 pm
Supreme Court recently made it harder for the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) to obtain injunctive relief against employers in disputes over alleged “unfair labor practices” — directing courts to use the traditional (and strict) four-factor injunction test rather than an easier test some courts had been applying in such disputes (Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:22 pm
On June 17, 2024, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”) issued its first mandatory bargaining order to an employer after its momentous decision in Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC last year. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 5:47 am
Appeals Board (Waggoner) (2021) 86 Cal. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 1:14 pm
The National Labor Relations Board, holding that when seeking a Section 10(j) preliminary injunction under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or the “Board”) must satisfy the traditional four-factor test for a preliminary injunction. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
National Labor Relations Board.Continue Reading › [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
New(ish) Player: The resurgence of labor activism at the proxy ballot box. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
New(ish) Player: The resurgence of labor activism at the proxy ballot box. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 3:37 am
For instance: In 2021, the NLRB’s General Counsel issued a memorandum, which we covered, asserting that college athletes are employees under Section 2(3) of the Act with the right to form a labor union and engage in other protected, concerted activity, and that the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) would pursue unfair labor practice charges in appropriate cases against universities and… [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
Scholars have also discussed issues related to agency coordination and the implementation of the order. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 5:25 pm
This ruling is a significant blow to the National Labor Relations Board’s enforcement priorities. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 5:25 pm
This ruling is a significant blow to the National Labor Relations Board’s enforcement priorities. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
McKinney and, in doing so, clarified the standard applicable to the National Labor Relations Board’s (the “Board”) requests for preliminary injunctions under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”).Continue Reading › [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 4:45 am
But, in this case, the Board’s regional Director then filed a petition under Section 10( j) of the National Labor Relations Act, which authorizes it to seek temporary injunctions against employers (and unions) while a case is pending at the Board. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
National/Federal Supreme Court Rules California Man Can’t Trademark ‘Trump Too Small’ Associated Press News – Mark Sherman | Published: 6/13/2024 The U.S. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court ruled in favor of Starbucks’ challenge to a judicial order to rehire seven employees that sought to unionize while the company’s case against the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) proceeds. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 5:58 pm
The US Supreme Court sided with Starbucks on Thursday by determining that the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) needed to follow a four-part test to establish unfair labor practices and for the rehiring of unionized employees. [read post]
