Search for: "National Schools v. the United States" Results 1 - 20 of 5,683
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2024, 1:07 pm by David Pozen
The dispute concerns the meaning of the statutory phrase “currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
  Justifying Hamas's murderous pogrom by saying Israel deserved what it got is nothing less than supporting a terrorist organization – the same as blaming the United States for 9/11. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Aug 29, 2023 | Could West Virginia v EPA Strengthen State Climate Laws | Scholars argue that a recent Supreme Court decision may bolster state climate lawsuits. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm by Josh Blackman
I am doubtful that Justice Barrett would have joined United States v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
This approach rests upon a powerful policy basis that leads to superior innovation, macroeconomic outcomes, social cohesion and, therefore, superior national security for the United States. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
J., Data retention in Ireland: When European law meets national recalcitrance (2024), UCD Sutherland School of Law  Next week in the courts On Monday 13 May 2024 there will be an application for permission to appeal in the case of Saddler v Chiltern Support and Housing Ltd KA-2023-000055, before Linden J. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
This is recognized in the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at 9 FAM § 402.1-3 , which states that an “applicant desiring to come to the United States for one principal purpose, and one or more incidental purposes, must be classified in accordance with the principal purpose. [read post]
Contesting the state’s segregationist policy, they took their case (Parker v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am by INFORRM
The FT Group’s Chief Executive stated that it is right, “that AI platforms pay publishers for the use of their material. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
[V]iolent protest is not protected; peaceful protest is. [read post]