Search for: "Nations v. Chevron Usa*"
Results 1 - 20
of 83
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2024, 7:50 am
In National Cable & Telecommunications v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Another Toomey proposal, which was enacted into law as part of the 2023 National Defense Authorization Act and later codified as 12 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 7:55 am
The plaintiffs in Held v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
The Court then invoked its increasingly familiar “major questions doctrine” which, as the Court explained in West Virginia v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 3:54 pm
If the Supreme Court next term overrules Chevron USA v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:54 pm
A list of this week’s featured petitions is below: Chevron USA, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:44 pm
Vermont National Telephone Company v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
Supreme Court Industrial Union Dep’t v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
The use of administrative databases, whether based upon national healthcare or insurance claims, has become a common place in chronic disease epidemiology. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 3:14 pm
See Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:12 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 4:55 am
HollyFrontier argues that the EPA should be allowed deferential treatment in interpreting legislation as established in Chevron USA Inc. v Natural Resource Defense Council, Inc. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 6:19 am
The United States finally invokes Chevron USA v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm
” Now the claims here are quite unsettling, especially considering that they were lodged in a defense brief, in an MDL, with many cases at stake, made on behalf of an important pharmaceutical company, represented by two large, capable national or international law firms. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:54 am
In Barton, the Supreme Court is examining once again the stop-time rule – the same provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act that the justices dissected in Pereira v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:58 pm
In writing the 1984 majority opinion in Chevron USA v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 10:47 am
Chris Hoofnagle, they chose opt-out to avoid the IMS v. [read post]
