Search for: "Newman v. Holder" Results 1 - 20 of 83
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 2:23 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
The holder of the trade secret must take reasonable measures to protect the secrecy of his information. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am by Dennis Crouch
Judge Newman also concluded that the district court improperly shifted the burden of proof to the copyright holder. = = = Parties: DALE M. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:29 am by Peter Mahler
In another First Department decision earlier this month, the court in Newman v Newman affirmed a decision by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Barry R. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Newman, 959 F.3d 1288 (11th Cir. 2020): In a software case using the abstraction, filtration, comparison approach, the burden of proof on the protectability of what was copied is on the defendant in the filtration analysis, not on the plaintiff. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 3:48 am by Ben
Although ISPs often receive requests from rights holders to restrict illegal download sites, the arrangement with the Premier League is unique in that it requires illegal streams to be blocked as matches are played, in real-time. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
That's a sham.To illustrate this truism perfectly, just read the relatively short injunction opinion in Polymet Corp. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:11 am by Peter Mahler
Reese v Newman In a decision last month by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals in Reese v Newman, No. 14-CV-283 [D.C. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:11 am by Peter Mahler
Reese v Newman In a decision last month by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals in Reese v Newman, No. 14-CV-283 [D.C. [read post]