Search for: "No. 90-1372" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2018, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Andrew’s affidavit was sufficient to raise a question of fact as to whether the defendant engaged in a course of continuous representation intended to rectify or mitigate the initial act of alleged malpractice (see Melnick v Farrell, 128 AD3d 1371, 1372 [2015]; DeStaso v Condon Resnick, LLP, 90 AD3d 809, 812-813 [2011]; Gravel v Cicola, 297 AD2d 620, 621 [2002]). [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
Cartwright (California Court of Appeals 1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 1362, 1370–1372). [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 11:20 am by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2009) (same); In re Borden, 90 F.3d 1570, 1574 (Fed. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
This post is only from the Reed Smith (more properly, the non-Dechert) side of the blog.One hundred what, you say? [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:33 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Dietz & Watson, Inc., 679 F.3d 1372, 1377 (Fed. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 3:45 pm
Claim construction is a legal greased pig: hard to tackle. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 8:08 pm
., 503 F.3d 1372, 1380 n.3 (Fed. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:40 am
., 566 F.3d 1372, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 4:27 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
Burglary is a either a second or third degree crime, depending on the factors described below. [read post]