Search for: "No. 96-1019"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
E199 (2010). [2] Notice of retraction for Teng Zeng & William Mitch, “Oral intake of ranitidine increases urinary excretion of N-nitrosodimethylamine,” 37 Carcinogenesis 625 (2016), published online (May 4, 2021) (retraction requested by authors with an acknowledgement that they had used incorrect analytical methods for their study). [3] Tianwei He, “Retraction of global scientific publications from 2001 to 2010,” 96 Scientometrics 555 (2013); Bhumika Bhatt,… [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 4:58 am
“Accrual is measured from the commission of the alleged malpractice, when all facts necessary to the cause of action have occurred and the aggrieved party can obtain relief in court, regardless of when the operative facts are discovered by the plaintiff” (Farage v Ehrenberg, 124 AD3d at 164 [citations omitted]; see Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 166). [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
Pix Credit here The jurisprudence of the Religion Clauses in the United States has long been plagued by the doctrine that distinguishes between governmental speech and private speech. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
Toth, No. 22-CV-96 (C.P. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
INTRODUCTION The new, third edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence was released to the public in September 2011, as a joint production of the National Academies of Science, and the Federal Judicial Center. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 6:56 pm
Id. at 595–96, 610. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
96 Tex. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 7:26 am
Rev. 1019 (2018). [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 7:26 am
Rev. 1019 (2018). [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 9:15 am
J. 1019, 1049 (2009). [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
Edelman, 40 N.Y.2d 781, 390 N.Y.S.2d 393, 358 N.E.2d 1019 (1976).In Pulka, Plaintiffs sued not only the driver who struck a pedestrian, but also the owners of a parking garage. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:10 pm
at 785–786, 390 N.Y.S.2d 393, 358 N.E.2d 1019. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 9:50 am
Remember that lawful off-duty activity is also protected (Labor Code sec. 96(k).) [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:30 pm
Saito, 149 Misc.2d 342, 563 N.Y.S.2d 1019 (Crim.Ct.N.Y.Co.1990). [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 8:07 am
What is the GSTT or Generation Skipping Transfer Tax? [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
As a consequence, as far as the question of whether the [opponent] has complied with its duty to substantiate and whether its opposition may be considered admissible is concerned, only the legal and factual situation at the expiration of the time limit for filing an opposition is relevant (see T 1019/92). [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 4:49 am
City of Green Bay, 168 F.3d 1013, 1019 (7th Cir.1999); see also Allison Engine Co. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
In particular, the problem of Fry J's well-known five probanda in Willmott v Barber (1880) 15 Ch D 96, at 105, which has bedevilled this area in the past, is again at stake here because eg it was not known whether the Defendants' predecessor in title had made a mistake as to his legal rights (probanda 1). [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
In particular, the problem of Fry J's well-known five probanda in Willmott v Barber (1880) 15 Ch D 96, at 105, which has bedevilled this area in the past, is again at stake here because eg it was not known whether the Defendants' predecessor in title had made a mistake as to his legal rights (probanda 1). [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:57 pm
., 383 U.S. 1, 17 (1966); Kinetic Concepts, 554 F.3d at 1019. [read post]
