Search for: "O’Neal v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 144
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc., 368 F. 3d 371 (4th Cir. 2004) (“significant detrimental effect”); ONeal v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
The FDAs actions led the drug companies voluntarily to withdraw PPA-containing products. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
In Madisons discussion of Article IV in Federalist 44, he emphasizes that states require “protection against invasion” by both “foreign hostility” and potentially even aggressive fellow states of the union. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:01 pm by admin
Third, the Williams studys univariate analysis of smoking and bladder cancer generates risk ratios that are quite out of line with independent studies of smoking and bladder cancer risk. [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:58 am by Becky
McDonalds has filed applications for McDONALDs, MCCAFE, and its M Logo covering, among other things, “[v]irtual food and beverage products” in Class 9 and “[o]perating a virtual restaurant featuring actual food and beverages” in Class 43 (see here, here and here). 2. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 12:23 pm by SCOTUSblog
In 1997, he joined OMelveny & Myers and founded the firms appellate practice. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 8:33 am by Bridget Crawford
United States in the Tax volume, and Dean Browne Lewis rewrite of ONeal v. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 12:00 pm by Lee E. Berlik
ONeal, 224 Va. 343, 354 (1982) (“[W]e have approved the recovery of damages for humiliation, embarrassment, and similar harm to feelings, although unaccompanied by actual physical injury, where a cause of action existed independently of such harm. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 12:00 pm by Lee E. Berlik
ONeal, 224 Va. 343, 354 (1982) (“[W]e have approved the recovery of damages for humiliation, embarrassment, and similar harm to feelings, although unaccompanied by actual physical injury, where a cause of action existed independently of such harm. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 3:44 pm by Matt Pulle
ONeal (2018), the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals had to evaluate two competing claims for life insurance proceeds under an ERISA plan (“Plan”). [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm by Marty Lederman
  (Nor does this case remotely resemble Mooppan's hypothetical in which a state prison allows contractor or employee prison guards to bring peyote into the facility but not to bring in hoasca tea (a reference to the discriminatory treatment at issue in the Court's decision in Gonzales O Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal  (2006)). [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 4:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Miranda Sambursky Sloane Sklarin Ver Veniotis LLP, 150 A.D.3d 422, 423 (1st Dept 2017); ONeal v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 7:11 am by Adam Feldman
Hogan Lovells Neal Katyal argued the second most with four, along with federal government attorney Ann OConnell. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am by Schachtman
Some state statutes limited the coverage for workers compensation to diseases that manifested within a certain time window during and after employment. [read post]