Search for: "O2 Micro International Limited" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2018, 3:22 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
O2 Micro Int’l Ltd., 726 F.3d 1359, 1369 (Fed.Cir. 2013) (affirming full fee award based on conduct “thatwas ‘pervasive’ enough to infect the entire litigation”(internal citation omitted)); see also In re RembrandtTechs. [read post]
9 May 2017, 5:00 am by John Jascob
.; Quantum Corporation; Amerityre Corporation; O2 Micro International Limited; Jason Industries, Inc.; Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.; and KEMET Corporation. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 1:14 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
For that reason, thecourt stated that that it had a duty to resolve that dispute,citing O2 Micro International, Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 2:56 pm by Robert Vrana
The plaintiff cited the Federal Circuit’s holding in O2 Micro International Limited v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 3:55 pm by Justin E. Gray
Plaintiff argued on appeal that the district court erred by failing to further construe the claim term under O2 Micro. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 12:12 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Further- more, Finjan identifies no evidence that Defendants infringed the method claims by testing or operating any copies of the accused products in the United States.O2 Micro came up:According to Defendants, the district court shirked its responsibility to construe a disputed claim term by adopt- ing “plain and ordinary meaning,” violating the principles of O2 Micro International Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 11:41 pm by Kelly
No. 337-TA-701 in Certain Electronic Products, Including Mobile Phones, Portable Music Players, and Computers (ITC 337 Update) O2 Micro – Complainants O2 Micro, Inc. and O2 Micro Int’l, Ltd. appeal to Federal Circuit in Certain Cold Cathode Fluorescent Lamp Inverter Circuits and Products Containing the Same (ITC 337 Update) Panasonic Corp. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  In this regard, the ITC noted that O2 Micro was not required to prove beyond doubt that its domestic products met the claim limitations. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Limited (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) What happens when an opponent stops opposing: Delnorth Pty Ltd v Dura-Post (Aust) Pty Ltd (ipwars) Urgent interlocutory and declaratory relief: AED Oil Limited & Anor v Puffin FPSO Limited (ipwars) Infringement of copyright in musical works: a riff Down Under: Larrikin Music Publishing Pty Ltd v EMI Songs Australia Pty Limited (JIPLP)   Austria Austria: opposition possible… [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:39 am by Mike McCabe
By way of background, the Complainants in this investigation are O2 Micro International Ltd. and O2 Micro Inc. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Obama Administration tells Senate it supports patent reform changes (IP Watch) Patent Reform Act has false marking in its sites (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Patent reform that hurts small inventors and small businesses (Inventive Step) Department of Commerce white paper supports patent reform (Inventive Step) (Patent Docs) (IP Watch) (Patently-O)   US Patents Northern District of Illinois is a top patent district any way you slice it (Chicago… [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:58 pm
" O2 Micro Int'l Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 4:26 pm
  Respondents responded that O2 Micro had misread the jury verdict from the other litigation, and, further, that the other litigation involved a different, albeit related, patent, with substantially different claim limitations. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) GOOD magazine article on Erich Spangenberg: The ethics of patent trolling (The Prior Art)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC to hear claim and continuation rule case en banc; litigation schedule set: Tafas v Doll (Filewrapper) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (IP Watchdog) (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) (Gray on Claims) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Inventive Step) CAFC: Properly construed claims failed to read on preferred… [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(BLOG@IP::JUR) Survey results – Next PTO Director (Patently-O) International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA) submission to Special 301 Review (Intellectual Property Watch) (Ars Technica) Outline for today’s ABA-ALI presentation on IP ADR (The IP ADR Blog) US congressional, USPTO officials see Geneva policymaking up close (Intellectual Property Watch)   US General – Decisions 9th Circuit limits the scope of in-term covenants not to… [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IP finance)   Global - Copyright A bit about derivative works (Ip's What's Up)     Australia Singapore Treaty takes effect March 2009 (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Capital allowances: business related costs – business transfer arrangement establishing right to intellectual property (IP Down Under) Droit de suite scheme introduced into Parliament (International Law Office) Interlocutory relief partially granted in Sebel Furniture… [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
(Techdirt) Halliburton tries to patent form of patent trolling (Techdirt) (I/P Updates)(Law360) From 15 September, committing any crime can result in revocation of ‘privilege’ to prosecute before USPTO (Patent Prospector) USPTO to increase PCT transmittal and search fees (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) US Patents – Decisions Questions of fact re alleged enjoined imitations prevent contempt: Liquid Dynamics Corp v Vaughan (Chicago Intellectual Property… [read post]