Search for: "OMEGA SA"
Results 1 - 20
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2024, 9:05 pm
It is imbued with comparable nutritional richness, especially protein and omega-3 fatty acids. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 2:13 am
The average consumer’s level of attention was therefore found by the Court to be “at least medium if not slightly higher”.Co-existence agreementsLifestyle sought to argue that: (a) the need for a co-existence agreement demonstrates that brands are in conflict; and (b) in any event, co-existence agreements are not relevant to the assessment of likelihood of confusion, per Omega SA v OHIM.Again, the Court disagreed on both counts, finding that “the mere… [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am
Arnold LJ adopted a different interpretation of Case C-98/13 Blomqvist v Rolex SA than the trial judge in reaching this conclusion.Permission for Amazon to appeal to the UK Supreme Court was refused by Arnold LJ in a subsequent judgment on form of order.Targeting is a tricky doctrine. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 1:16 pm
” Omega SA (Omega AG) (Omega Ltd.) v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 1:16 pm
” Omega SA (Omega AG) (Omega Ltd.) v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:20 am
" In re Omega SA, 494 F.3d 1362, 83 USPQ2d 1541, 1544 (Fed. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 2:55 pm
Omega SA, Swatch, SA v. 375 Canal, LLC [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 2:50 pm
Omega SA v. 375 Canal, LLC, No. 12- CV-6979, 2016 WL 7439359, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 7:11 am
This issue may be of no interest to lawyers, but federal practitioners will take note the summary judgment denials are mere interlocutory orders for which a subsequent appeal is improper.The case is Omega SA v. 375 Canal, LLC, issued on January 6. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 3:33 am
” See In re Omega SA, 494 F.3d 1362, 83 USPQ2d 1541, 1544 (Fed. [read post]
7 May 2020, 5:14 am
., 126 USPQ2d 1400, 1407 (TTAB 2018) (quoting In re Omega SA, 494 F.3d 1362, 83 USPQ2d 1541, 1544 (Fed. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 5:00 am
Photo by ELEVATE on Pexels.com Earlier this year, a jury in New York federal court returned a verdict of $1.1 million in favor of Omega SA and its parents Swatch SA. [read post]
24 May 2018, 10:50 pm
The judge (Arnold J) agreed but based upon his reasoning in Omega Engineering v Omega SA [2012] EWHC 3440 (Ch), he held that rather than delete “insurance services” from the specification, the appropriate order was to amend the specification so as to read: “insurance services except fidelity insurance” (emphasis added). [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 3:09 am
The Board noted that applicant was not required to disclaim FURNITURE WAREHOUSE in its prior registrations, but that was irrelevant:While we recognize that “consistency is highly desirable,” In re Omega SA, 494 F.3d 1362, 83 USPQ2d 1541, 1544 (Fed. [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:48 am
” SAS Inst., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 10:39 am
Omega SA v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 2:24 am
Omega SA (Omega AG) (Omega LTD.) v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:39 am
Omega SA v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 8:30 am
Omega SA v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 3:12 am
Omega SA (Omega AG) (Omega Ltd.) v. [read post]
