Search for: "Octane Fitness, LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 164
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2022, 7:34 am by Eric Goldman
Groupon moved for attorneys’ fees pursuant to the Lanham Act fee-shifting provision, which applies in “exceptional” cases (as defined by Octane Fitness). [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 1:29 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Core Health & Fitness, LLC, 2022 WL 2751685, --- F.4th ----, 2022 WL 2751685 (6th Circuit Jul. 14, 2022) The court of appeals, over a dissent that would have upheld everything, upholds a jury confusion verdict on fairly thin grounds, and upholds the trial court's rejection of the jury's damage award, but rejects a profits enhancement/attorneys’ fee award to avoid double-counting and reliance on theories that would not be sufficient to uphold the underlying jury… [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 2:10 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
The second standard, a more relaxed totality of the circumstances analysis under the Patent Act, was announced by the Supreme Court in Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Still, under Octane Fitness, a fee shift was unwarranted; “there was no unusual discrepancy in the merits of the parties’ positions,” especially given that the VSL parties got two preliminary injunctions. [read post]