Search for: "Office of People's Counsel v. PUBLIC SERV."
Results 1 - 20
of 1,288
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2024, 5:51 am
… But we were not willing to resign our peoples to this death sentence, occasioned by the continuing failure to take effective action against climate change. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
” In Strickland v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 5:59 am
Having served as counsel for the Colorado voter respondents in the case, I agree the Court simply got it wrong. [read post]
27 May 2024, 2:27 pm
A great many federal criminal proceedings do involve appointed counsel, such as the attorneys employed as federal public defenders (FPDs) at the Federal Public Defender’s office for the Northern District of Texas. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:17 am
An eyewitness reported that one of the people involved was a dreadlocked Black man. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Meetings of the IRC are not open to the public and members are not considered public officers for purposes of the Public Officers Law (see Executive Law § 94 [3] [k]-[l]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Meetings of the IRC are not open to the public and members are not considered public officers for purposes of the Public Officers Law (see Executive Law § 94 [3] [k]-[l]). [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
The scheme is included among the conduct charged in the federal indictment against former President Donald Trump by the Department of Justice’s Office of Special Counsel. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:49 am
He told the Daily Journal, a legal publication, that there is no conflict since he is ‘adverse to the People of the State of California’ in both cases. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm
We wrote: We start from a simple premise: Most people run for office, and seek to remain in office, based on a belief that they—and not others—are in the best position to promote the public welfare, however defined. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm
Fitzgerald (which held that the former president had absolute immunity from civil liability for his official acts in office), and Morrison v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
This law states “Any two or more persons who conspire to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office by unlawful means and which conspiracy is acted upon by one or more of the parties thereto, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:56 am
Let’s talk about Easha’s first case, Murray v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am
Trial in The People of the State of New York vs. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:25 pm
Instead, it concerns the powers of people who have been properly appointed to Justice Department offices "under law" pursuant to other statutory provisions. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 2:08 pm
In McCall v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 10:51 am
From yesterday's Ohio Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
After feedback from the public and the Yale researchers, the group submitted a final protocol in April 1994. [read post]
