Search for: "Owens-Illinois v. Armstrong"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2008, 10:40 am
The supreme court determined that the Maryland court's approach is the better reasoned one: in Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:15 am
(holding that plaintiffs had failed to prove that their cancers were caused by radiation exposures, on the basis of their statistical, epidemiological proofs), aff’d, 339 F.2d 605, (6th Cir. 1964)(per curiam) Kamosky v Owens-Illinois Co., 89 F. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am
Owens-Illinois, Inc., et al., No. 8704-1464 (Philadelphia Cty. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:46 am
Rapid Transit, 317 Mass. 469, 470, 58 N.E.2d 754, 755 (1945) (evidence that defendant was the only bus franchise operating in the area where the accident took place was not sufficient to establish that the bus that caused the accident belonged to the defendant where private or chartered buses could have been in the area; it is not enough that mathematically the chances somewhat favor the proposition to be proved) Kamosky v Owens-Illinois Co., 89 F. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm
However, Judge Quinn-Brintnall argued that Judge Armstrong’s stated concern about the improper use of expert testimony to support the lea [read post]
