Search for: "PRACTICAL POLITICAL CONSULTING INC V SECRETARY OF STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 41
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
 Canada On 2 January 2024, the Supreme Court of British Columbia awarded summary judgement on the issue of quantum in favour of the plaintiff in the case of Pineau v Glacier Media Inc 2024 BCSC 4. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 11:33 pm by INFORRM
The information and opinions that the injunction de-listed concerned attacks against students participating in political groups, allegedly carried out by Paquez in his role as Secretary General of a public university. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
In its most recent manifestations one sees the imposition of public pressure on the National Basketball Association and on Apple Inc. respecting their entanglement in Xinjiang that increasingly serves as the defining point for the difference between US and Chinese normative approaches to public governance; here and here). [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 4:31 am by Shannon O'Hare
According to US Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, the sanctions were issued “for the sale and transport of Venezuela’s crude oil” which violated the existing US sanctions on PDVSA. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has launched a public consultation on a draft direct marketing code of practice. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:16 am by Margaret Taylor
The FBI responded that “[a]ny decision to release materials” relating to this inquiry “would be made in consultation with the relevant agency(ies). [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 10:00 am by Jordan Brunner
S. government and damage to its reputation, the government first argues the alleged injury is not redressable because “it is legally or practically foreclosed by forces outside the court’s control” (McConnell v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am by Josh Blackman
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]