Search for: "Pamela Long v. US, corrected"
Results 1 - 20
of 52
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2024, 9:37 am
Greely: That’s correct. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 2:18 pm
Professor Pamela KarlanSince 1973, when the Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:47 pm
Start w/question of strict liability v. blanket immunity; look at possible regimes; map out core elements of 512, DSA, and 230. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 7:46 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
He would have us pass significant constitutional reforms or have a new constitutional convention. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 11:14 am
Liberal New York Times columnist Pamela Paul has called on Roberts to resign, a cause my co-blogger Josh Blackman has long advocated from the right. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 3:57 pm
She succeeded Pamela Talkin, who retired July 31 after 19 years as marshal. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm
Matthew Sag and Pamela Samuelson, Hysteresis: An Empirical Study of Copyright Injunctions After eBay v. [read post]
30 May 2021, 4:07 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statement since our last Round Up: 00565-21 Tatton v The Sunday Times, 1 Accuracy (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach – after investigation. 00394-21 Pelling v Metro, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: publication of correction. 28673-20 Webb v The Northern Echo, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia)… [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am
And, in fact, I believe that you had dedicated one of your books to him; is that correct? [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 10:16 am
Kahle from 2006 as the plaintiff in Kahle v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:48 pm
Laird and Marbury v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:32 am
Pamela S. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
FDR succeeded in that respect (even if Barry Cushman’s no-switch analysis of Justice Roberts is correct). [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm
“That should tip us off that something is wrong,” Roberts says. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 6:30 am
In his dissent in West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:47 am
Reporters’ guesses are usually correct, as long as one ignores all the times that our speculation misses the mark. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 12:19 pm
Kennedy is next with Lozman v. [read post]
