Search for: "Parker v. Phillips"
Results 1 - 20
of 75
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 7:51 am
Parker, COA23-90, ___ N.C. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:45 am
(See Phillips-Smith Special Retail Group IL L.P. v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, L.L.P, 265 AD2d 208,210 [1st Dept 1999].) [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 7:07 am
” It’s Time to Prepare More Seriously for the Next. by Nikita Lalwani (@nikitaalalwani), Alasdair Phillips-Robins (@alasdairpr) and Sam Winter Levy (@SamWinterLevy) (June 15, 2021) The U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 5:38 am
Contrary to defendant’s contention, the allegations underlying the claim are not “couched in terms of gross speculations on future events” (see Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208 [1st Dept 1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 759 [2000]). [read post]
4 May 2022, 12:33 pm
From Phillips v. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 10:07 am
” In Verdantus Advisors, LLC v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:06 am
Ford Presidential LibraryKristin Phillips, Public Affairs Specialist, the Gerald R. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:06 am
Ford Presidential LibraryKristin Phillips, Public Affairs Specialist, the Gerald R. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 3:30 am
As the IAS court found, the allegations underlying plaintiff’s malpractice claim were couched in terms of “gross speculations” about future events, without the requisite factual basis to support the allegation (see Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1st Dept 1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 759 [2000]). [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 3:11 am
The court correctly determined that the complaint is devoid of allegations from which it could be inferred that any negligence by defendants in their handling of the family court proceeding was the “but for” causation of any damages (see Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293 [1st Dept 2001]; see also Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1st Dept 1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 759… [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am
App. 2011); Phillips v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 6:02 am
In that case, Lucia v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
(See e.g., Leff v Fulbright & aworski, L.L.P., 78 AD3d 531, 533 [1st Dept 2010], lv denied 17 NY3d 705 [2011] [damages in malpractice case “grossly speculative” where plaintiff could not establish what would have occurred but for defendants’ conduct]; Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Grp. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 4:06 am
The allegation that plaintiff would have stopped speculating on the stock at a time when its shares were selling for an amount greater than his actual investment thus depends on “a chain of gross speculations on future events” (Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1st Dept 1999] [internal quotation marks omitted], lv denied 94 NY2d 759 [2000]). [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 4:47 am
”‘ (Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II, LP., v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimp, LLP, 265 AD2d at 210.) [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 3:43 am
The allegation that plaintiff would have stopped speculating on the stock at a time when its shares were selling for an amount greater than his actual investment thus depends on “a chain of gross speculations on future events” (Phillips-Smith Speciality Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1st Dept 1999] [internal quotation marks omitted], lv denied 94 NY2d 759 [2000]). [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
Crystal Parker, Jason Gregory Johns, Harris Huguenard, Lionel M. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:29 pm
Today, in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
The case, Trump v. [read post]
