Search for: "Parker v. Small et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Cockrum v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 9:53 am
American Civil Liberties Union Brandt et al v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:24 am
The LCD states the following: “Evaluation of the clinical literature indicates that studies comparing the efficacy of CTPs to alternative wound care approaches with patients’ autologous skin are limited in number, apply mainly to generally healthy patients, and examine only a small portion of the CTP products available in the United States. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:59 am
” As part of his plea, the defendant admitted that he submitted, or caused to be submitted, five fraudulent Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) applications to the Small Business Administration (SBA) on behalf of his hospice (which was never operational during the pandemic) and four other entities that he controlled. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm
Fromer: want to be sure we’re covering large businesses v. small businesses with less sophistication that may not know what’s actually available. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm
See Parker v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
David Hyman & David Franklyn A couple of small empirical studies and armchair empiricism; lots of regulatory interest. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 11:55 am
” Steven Walters, et al. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:34 pm
Gasoline contains small amounts of benzene, on the order of 1 percent or less. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 2:03 pm
Thus, for instance, Epstein et al. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 8:35 am
North Coast Rivers Alliance et al. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 2:11 pm
Parker Shattuck Neighbors, et al, v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:11 pm
Lemley et al., Life After Bilski, 63 Stan. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 1:35 pm
The case in question, Parker v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 10:44 am
., Parker v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 7:11 am
Spitzer et al., Case No. 11-05843). [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:12 am
Case: Parker v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 6:34 am
" The Examiner used this to advance the substitution rationale: It would have been obvious ... to have substituted the wire braid 35 of Horrigan et al. with a braided wire coil, a flat wire coil or a round wire coil as disclosed by Park et al. to have facilitated the manufacture of the catheter or sheath with a diameter suitable for application in an environment of increasingly small diameters. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 10:15 pm
Abercrombie & Fitch, et al, 6:10cv111 / PACid v. [read post]