Search for: "Parks IP Law LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 81
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2024, 7:57 am by Karen Gullo
This should not be optional, but rather a mandatory safeguard, to avoid criminalizing routine behavior such as changing one’s IP address, inspecting website code, and accessing unpublished URLs. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 4:03 am
Tribal Minds, LLC, Opposition No. 91269117 [Opposition to registration of WHISKEYSMITH for "distilled spirits" on the ground of likelihood of confusion with the allegedly previously used, identical common law mark for whiskey.] [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 12:47 pm by Annsley Merelle Ward
Returning to the trendy IP topic de-jour, the panel discussed the copyright aspects of NFTs and their application to decades old commercial agreements in Miramax, LLC v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:09 am by Eric Goldman
The opinion tackles one of the hottest topics in Internet Law: do UGC services engage in editorial functions protected by the First Amendment? [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 6:00 pm by Juvan Bonni
Park & Associates, PLC Kennedy Lenart Spraggins LLP Cooper Legal Group, LLC Klintworth & Rozenblat IP LLP Holland & Hart Hamilton Brook Smith & Reynolds – Patent Attorney (Organic Chemistry) Hamilton Brook Smith & Reynolds – Patent Attorney (Biotechnology) MH2 Technology Law Group, LLP Knobbe Martens – Patent Scientist Knobbe Martens – Patent Counsel Christopher & Weisberg, PA Smith & Hopen, P.A. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 6:00 pm by Juvan Bonni
 Peter Lee: Patent Law’s Externality Asymmetry (Source: SSRN) New Job Postings on Patently-O: Daikin NA H.C. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 8:18 am by Dan Bressler
” “Atlanta Law Firms Deny Conflict In Georgia Election Suits” — “Atlanta-based law firms Taylor English Duma LLP and Robbins Ross Alloy Belinfante Littlefield LLC on Thursday denied an alleged conflict of interest over their involvement in representing Georgia election officials in one voting suit and the Donald Trump campaign and Georgia Republicans in another. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 3:37 pm by Juvan Bonni
US Department of Commerce / Office of Inspector General Dority & Manning Klarquist Sparkman, LLP McBee, Moore & Vanik IP, LLC G&G AJ Park Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 1:59 am by Parks & Jones
You Have Unique Jurisdictional Considerations to Take Into Account Business entities exist under state law, and corporation and LLC laws vary from one state to the next. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On 12 November 2019 IP Kat covered the case of Herbay v Hungary, Appl. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Case Law: R (Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police: The use of facial recognition software by the police is lawful –  Suneet Sharma. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 11:57 pm by Robert Margolis
Case date: 07 August 2019 Case number:No. 18-10157 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 10:06 am by Howard Knopf
Equustek Solutions Inc.,[2017] 1 SCR 824, 2017 SCC 34  if anything already goes further than necessary to protect IP owners, including copyright owners and confirms the jurisdiction of superior courts to issue worldwide deindexing orders. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
Issues: (1) Whether the Federal Communications Commission has statutory authority under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to impose common-carrier regulation on internet-access service; and (2) whether the FCC’s order below was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or undertaken without observance of the procedures required by law. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 1:20 pm
Domain name: Prior use in commerce: Common law mark: E-commerce: Internet law: Trademark: Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy: OMPI (UDRP): Anticybersquatting: ACPA: Consumer law: Appellant Direct Niche, LLC initiated this case against Appellee Via Varejo S/A under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA), 15 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 4:24 pm by Ad Law Defense
  What $600 billion Menlo Park company is missing from that sentence? [read post]