Search for: "Pearce v. Pearce" Results 1 - 20 of 217
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2011, 8:17 am by clee
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton and Judicial Watch client Arizona State Senate President Russell Pearce offered the following statements today regarding the Supreme Court’s decision upholding the constitutionality of Arizona’s “Legal Arizona Workers Act,” legislation crafted by Pearce to penalize Arizona businesses that knowingly hire illegal aliens (Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:30 am by azatty
And that is never more true than in lawsuits regarding pending elections (see Bush v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 8:55 am by Justin F. Keith
Update: Member Schaumber issued a statement on June 22 on the Supreme Court's decision in New Process Steel v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:16 pm by immigrationprof
Even though the Supreme Court held in 1982 that a state cannot discriminate against undocument children in public school education (Plyler v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
R v Pearce rehearses the arguments which relate to questions of anonymity – or not – in the context of prosecution of a child (considered in more detail with law references here). [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 11:40 am by immigrationprof
Guest blogger: Liz Pearce, 3L Student, University of San Francisco School of Law: On March 18th, 2013, Gideon v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 9:22 am by gstasiewicz
Date: Wednesday, December 8 Time: 2:00 – 3:30 PM ET Location: National Press Club’s Murrow Room. 529 14th Street NW, Washington, DC 20045 The panel follows Supreme Court arguments of Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al., Petitioners v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:18 am by Matrix Law
On Wednesday 5th April the Court will hand-down judgment in  R (on the application of Pearce and another) v Parole Board for England and Wales [2023] UKSC 13. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 2:03 pm
The Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer, Chris Pearce, has announced that he has referred issues arising from the High Court decision in Sons of Gwalia Ltd v Margaretic (the Sons of Gwalia case) to the Corporations and Markets Advisory Committee (CAMAC) for consideration and advice. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:01 pm by Susan I. Nelson
It’s incredible to me that Russell Pearce, Governor Brewer, and other anti-immigrant groups are claiming victory in the Supreme Court’s decision today because one provision—2(B) was not struck down. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 10:14 am by Tammy Binford
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in Noel Canning v. [read post]