Search for: "People v. Clark (1970)"
Results 1 - 20
of 67
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Malcolm Clark, Jr., ed., Pharisee Among Philistines: The Diary of Judge Matthew P. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Regulatory Analysis October 12, 2023 | Joseph Cordes, Susan Dudley and Clark Nardinelli, George Washington University Regulatory Studies Center; Donald S. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 3:24 pm
Troops, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:55 am
In Katz v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:43 pm
Some people are waving flags and watching the fireworks, proud of the America they think it is. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
By 1970 this had all completely changed. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am
On May 14, a criminal with an AR rifle had murdered 10 people at a supermarket in Buffalo. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 7:03 pm
Cochran v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
In Murphy v IRTC Barrington J gave two examples of the common good: the case concerned a ban on religious advertising in section 10(3) of the Radio and Television Act, 1988 (also here), and Barrington J (at [30]) held that the ban in section 10(3) could be justified either to prevent public unrest, or to ensure that, in matters of sensitivity, rich people “should not be able to buy access to the airwaves to the detriment of their poorer rivals”.… [read post]
20 May 2022, 11:43 pm
I suspect that when I first joined the House of Commons service in 1970 I was probably an office-holder – though, for all I know, I may have been a worker. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 10:05 pm
Mitchell Clark of The Verge notes that another new feature coming to Fitness+ is the ability to connect remotely to up to 32 people so that you all do a workout together at the same time and see each others' faces on the side of the screen. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 6:48 am
A 1978 Supreme Court case, Monell v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am
Most people see the negotiations as an implicit concession that the material is protected by copyright (or by some other type of intellectual property). [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
In Colgrove v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 10:05 pm
Now that I think about it, it has been a long time since I wrote citations for an academic publication — I see that the law review article that I wrote in law school hasn't been cited since Clark v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Bickel’s account – essentially, to emphasize the principles underlying the 14th Amendment and its capacity for growth, rather than how people at the time understood it – is of a piece with one of the ways originalists try to save their approach from generating unacceptable conclusions. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
(Center for History and Economics, Harvard University)Moderators: Elizabeth Lhost, Dartmouth College (elizabeth.d.lhost@dartmouth.edu) and Emma Rothschild, Harvard University (rothsch@fas.harvard.edu)Convener: Kalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Debjani Bhattacharya, Drexel University (db893@drexel.edu) South Asia 1Julia Stephens, Rutgers University (julia.stephens@rutgers.edu) South Asia 2Tatiana Seijas, Rutgers University… [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:16 pm
"); see also Clark D. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:38 pm
Is it the sum of contractual relations among some of the people with stakes in the joint enterprise? [read post]
