Search for: "People v. Shields" Results 1 - 20 of 1,928
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
In Part One, we laid out the larger First Amendment framework in which the dispute might be located and discussed how the Court’s language and reasoning in Hazelwood School District v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: This Article takes a contrarian approach to the first Justice Harlan’s famous phrase from his dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-China Economic and Security Review Commission was created by the United States Congress in October 2000 with the legislative mandate to monitor, investigate, and submit to Congress an annual report on the national security implications of the bilateral trade and economic relationship between the United States and the People’s Republic of China, and to provide recommendations, where appropriate, to Congress for legislative and administrative action. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
The law of what people are allowed to do with their drones in the vicinity of other people’s property is undeveloped and the Counterclaim raises reasonable issues in this regard. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:35 am by centerforartlaw
Patty Gerstenblith, Distinguished Research Professor of Law at DePaul University, stated during her keynote address at the Kernochan Center’s symposium on Protecting Cultural Property, the significance of the destruction of cultural heritage sites “lies in the people. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 1:15 pm by NARF
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan (Michigan Health Care False Claims Act (HCFCA)) Waukegan Potawatomi Casino, LLC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:16 am by Don Chen
The debate over what is often termed “jawboning” will come before the Supreme Court, which will hear arguments in Murthy v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:25 pm by Xandra Kramer
The collective action was aimed representing people in the Netherlands, but was extended to people who have moved abroad during the procedure, and these are under the opt-in rule. [read post]