Search for: "People v Barrington" Results 1 - 20 of 53
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2024, 5:19 am by jonathanturley
” With limited “boxes” supplied by the CDC, people had to write in their complications. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
FDA Advances Program for Real-World Evidence February 27, 2023 | Blair Bean Robertson, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals FDA’s approach to evidence-based decision-making may not be addressed to the right people. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
Constitutional Commitments to Aspirational Principles July 11, 2022 | Tobias Barrington Wolff, University of Pennsylvania Law School The majority’s reasoning in Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
In Murphy v IRTC Barrington J gave two examples of the common good: the case concerned a ban on religious advertising in section 10(3) of the Radio and Television Act, 1988 (also here), and Barrington J (at [30]) held that the ban in section 10(3) could be justified either to prevent public unrest, or to ensure that, in matters of sensitivity, rich people “should not be able to buy access to the airwaves to the detriment of their… [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 12:10 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Barrington Now let’s look at what happened in the case of Coppard v. [read post]