Search for: "People v Holder (Michael)"
Results 1 - 20
of 327
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
Yes, that Michael Avenatti Michael Avenatti enjoyed his 15 minutes of fame representing porn star Stormy Daniels in her suit against then-President Donald Trump. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am
Doe, involving First Amendment limitations on imposing liability on protest organizers (Sotomayor filed this statement respecting the denial); and three-time relist Michaels v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 3:52 pm
The court held that the conviction was consistent with the First Amendment, as applied in Holder v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Thus, recognition of the right to same-sex marriage not only does not harm people who oppose same-sex marriage; it affirmatively benefits them.Expanding the circle of right-holders in other ways can also benefit existing right-holders who might think of themselves as harmed by that expansion. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
For present purposes, however, the important point to understand is that Trump’s primary merits argument, to which he devotes the first 13 pages of the Argument section of his brief (pp. 20-33), concerns only the second, middle “Officials Clause,” which identifies the current and former office-holders to whom Section 3 potentially applies, rather than the government positions that an insurrectionist or rebel is ineligible to occupy going forward. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
[Scholars and lawyers should exercise caution before citing a new paper by James Heilpern and Michael T. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
From Keisel v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 2:35 am
Although China is not a common law jurisdiction, the judgments published by the Supreme People’s Court from time to time do provide referenceable guidance to juridical practice in China. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 6:05 am
Michael R. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 4:09 am
Discovery Radiology Physicians, P.C.; Allstate Insurance Company, The People ex rel. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 4:05 am
ItalyCasaPound v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Technologists v. [read post]
Of Insurrections, Presidents, and the Utter Failure of Constitutional Law to Address the Real Issues
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
It applies to a broad swath of civilian, military, and legislative office holders who swore oaths of fidelity to the Constitution, and it disqualifies such persons from holding in the future any of an extraordinarily broad swath of public offices.Leaving aside the imprecise nature of a "broad sweep," I am inclined to agree with the authors' conclusions about how Section 3 disqualifies Trump. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 1:01 am
” Evaluation: Michael A. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am
Like Vince, I don’t want to spend too much debating the question of how pro-bond holder and how out of step with prior law the 19th Century Supreme Court railroad bond cases were (and indeed how out of step they were with the Court’s understanding of non-infrastructure related municipal bond cases like Loan Association v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:05 pm
In the landmark case of Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 11:37 am
For example, in Michael Grecco Prods. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 3:30 am
After Cohen, in Holder v. [read post]
