Search for: "People v Holman"
Results 1 - 20
of 50
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2024, 1:55 am
Editor’s note: This article is part of a new series from leading experts with practical solutions to democratic backsliding, polarization, and political violence. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 10:27 am
By Chris Holman UCB, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
” Not only do people enter with full knowledge but there is no charge. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
A v Cornwall Council [2017] EWHC 842 (QB). [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
Meanwhile, further down the judicial corridor, Holman J took a different view. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 2:55 am
The rubric is the warning that traditionally appears at the top of a judgment telling people what they can and can’t do with it. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 8:11 am
Court of Appeals, in Jacobson Holman PLLC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
The case in McBrayer v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 3:36 am
” In an op-ed at Newsweek, Alida Garcia warns that “[ICE] admits it is reopening previously closed removal cases of DACA recipients, [which] could allow [the agency] to start detaining and deporting people as quickly as possible if the Supreme Court gives it the green light” in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 12:20 pm
And, for instance, the telephone call of September 6th, 2013, there were eight disabled people in eight separate cases billed two-tenths of an hour for receiving telephone calls from representatives from Security Bank . . . ; so 1.6 hours [were] billed if you count all of these disabled people for that call. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:22 pm
Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council [2016] EWHC 2864. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 8:00 am
Moseson v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 8:00 am
Moseson v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 9:15 pm
Fisher also notes that Justice Stephen Breyer, in the Nike v. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 2:36 pm
See A and B v Rotherham MBC [2014] EWFC 47 Fam. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 6:20 am
King, in which the Court will consider whether the Fourth Amendment allows states to collect and analyze DNA from people arrested and charged with serious crimes. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 1:34 am
The Gray v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Anor case - see below. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 pm
" had never happened.The offending passage -- which so "shocked" the betrayed Deputy -- appears (as stated) in First Corinthians (ch. 6, v. 9). [read post]
