Search for: "People v Lynch"
Results 1 - 20
of 626
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2024, 4:00 am
"Translation: I have now been subject to a "high tech lynching" and to word bombs as harmful as real bombs, and that is why, and the only real reason why, I want to overturn New York Times v Sullivan. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:01 pm
In Duncan v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:05 am
Resources: The New Yorker: “A Facial-Recognition Tour of New York” (Jan. 15, 2024) EFF: “Clearview AI—Yet Another Example of Why We Need A Ban on Law Enforcement Use of Face Recognition Now” (Jan. 31, 2020) EFF on Face Recognition Technology Testimony of EFF’s Jennifer Lynch on Face Recognition to the House Oversight Committee (March 2017) ACLU v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
The ICO has issued a reprimand to West Midlands Police after the force repeatedly mixed up two people’s personal information. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 5:16 pm
The famous Brandeis brief appears around that time, in such cases as Muller v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
As Purcell recounts, the Taft Court understood itself as an unmediated channel for the values and mores of the American people. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm
Lynch (5th Cir. 2016). [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:34 am
The case is Family Equality v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
This freedom to speak against the government and government officials is essential in a free society committed to the preeminence of the people. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am
The ICO has fined two home improvement companies for marketing phone calls to people on the UK’s “do not call” register. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 5:55 am
Those cases are Rogoz v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:09 am
Supreme Court, Colorado Republican State Central Committee v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Despite their obvious intelligence, capacity for affection, when it comes to toxicology, dogs are not people, although some people act like the less reputable varieties of dogs. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:55 am
North Carolina v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:21 pm
The case is Parks v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm
For example, in thinking about the establishment of religion and activities prohibited under the First Amendment, she examined whether a particular religious display would suggest an endorsement of religion by the government in the mind of a reasonable observer (Lynch v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 12:56 pm
As Harrington explains,Mishaps leading to mob violence and lynch justice jeopardized the core message of religious redemption and state authority. [read post]