Search for: "People v Nevins"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2023, 12:02 pm
In two amicus briefs just filed in appellate courts, we argue that’s a clearly unconstitutional search.[1] The two cases are People v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 2:18 pm
EFF Legal Intern Talya Nevins contributed to the drafting of this blog post. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
See Nevins v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
Last month, the military commission for the matter of United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 3:59 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 12:35 pm
The military commission in United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 8:20 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 12:35 pm
The military commission in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 5:41 am
In Hively v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
Questions are now being asked why SBC claim ignorance of any of the events surrounding NERR which also controlled New Earth Solutions Group.The full Isle of Man court judgement is here: IOM FSA v THE ECO RESOURCES FUND / 14 July 2017 / CIVIL - CHANCERY PROCEDUREA feature on the report is available here; Fresh calls for "waste fiasco" inquiryFull updates on the Scottish Borders Council fiasco and other news from the Scottish Borders can be found… [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
First, as it relates to voluntariness: Ruiz marshals United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 11:04 am
Judge Pohl wastes no time in granting KSM’s attorney David Nevin’s motion for a delay to respond until after the defense receives discovery. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 12:02 pm
“The Supreme Court has said if you’re being treated differently because of your sex then it qualifies as sex discrimination, even if there is a colloquial phrase that might be more familiar to people,” Nevins replied. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 7:14 am
Nevin Adams at NAPA has done a great job of that already, right here in this story. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:10 am
Murphy v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm
Connell is fine with that: “You know, people change their p [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 2:25 am
" (Nevins, Murphy, Flood v Portroe Stevedores - EDA051 - [2005] ELR 282). [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
Masteller, Richard Nevin. [read post]
