Search for: "People v Reader" Results 1 - 20 of 6,592
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2024, 12:18 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
[Note to readers: This morning, the Supreme Court handed down a decision in Moore v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Such use of businesses' or people's names for obvious criticism is generally seen as legally permissible, see, e.g., Lamparello v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 11:43 am by Dylan Gibbs
According to the Court, reasonable readers would have ignored the bad review because of the author’s creative approach to grammar and spelling:The judge said the lawyer shouldn’t have sued over such a poorly written review. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:10 am by Dylan Gibbs
PS: in case you were wondering, you’re now one of 2,100 people subscribed to this newsletter. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am by David Pozen
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:01 am by Doriane Coleman
This was already the question in 1996 when [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg penned the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Aug 29, 2023 | Could West Virginia v EPA Strengthen State Climate Laws | Scholars argue that a recent Supreme Court decision may bolster state climate lawsuits. [read post]
18 May 2024, 2:48 pm by Larry
There is no backlight which makes using it as an ebook reader less than great. [read post]