Search for: "People v Reader" Results 1 - 20 of 6,588
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2024, 11:43 am by Dylan Gibbs
According to the Court, reasonable readers would have ignored the bad review because of the author’s creative approach to grammar and spelling:The judge said the lawyer shouldn’t have sued over such a poorly written review. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:10 am by Dylan Gibbs
PS: in case you were wondering, you’re now one of 2,100 people subscribed to this newsletter. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am by David Pozen
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:01 am by Doriane Coleman
This was already the question in 1996 when [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg penned the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Aug 29, 2023 | Could West Virginia v EPA Strengthen State Climate Laws | Scholars argue that a recent Supreme Court decision may bolster state climate lawsuits. [read post]
18 May 2024, 2:48 pm by Larry
There is no backlight which makes using it as an ebook reader less than great. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:07 pm by John Ross
This week the Tenth Circuit vacates that opinion and requests supplemental briefing on how the Supreme Court's recent decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:39 am by Mark Ashton
Readers familiar with the Hanrahan case decided in 2017 by the Supreme Court know that while Mr. [read post]
12 May 2024, 3:51 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
They also requested that the number of people with access be limited to 3 staff members. [read post]