Search for: "People v Waiters" Results 1 - 20 of 55
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
John Jerry Glas, The New Science of Trial Advocacy:  The Waiter Pivot (2023). [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Your case is dismissed under Rooker-Feldman and Younger *and* Heck v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Roger Parloff
In every bid to transfer venue that Capitol riot defendants have raised, the key precedent the government has cited in response has been the same: Haldeman v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Pa. 1989) (perception by employer that male waiters "present a better image" for the restaurant cannot make sex into a bona fide qualification), rev'd on other grounds, 909 F.2d 747 (3d Cir. 1990); Bollenbach v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Pa. 1989) (perception by employer that male waiters "present a better image" for the restaurant cannot make sex into a bona fide qualification), rev'd on other grounds, 909 F.2d 747 (3d Cir. 1990); Bollenbach v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 11:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” and also people worried about liability so they may not opt out. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 6:50 am by Eric Turkewitz
So sayeth New York’s highest court back in 2011 in Shiamili v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 5:05 am by Josh Blackman
In some cases, paid line waiters would save several spaces. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
The Supreme Court’s decision in Minnesota v. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 9:05 pm by Paul C. Light
The government shutdown not only affected federal workers but it made it hard to keep the cooks and waiters busy at the Bickering Sisters Café just down the street from the James V. [read post]
25 May 2018, 5:44 am by Joy Waltemath
He alleged that only that the restaurant employed him and individual people who are agents of the employer cannot be sued as employers under Title VII. [read post]