Search for: "People v. Douglas (1969)" Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
”[5] At the same time, the SEC found, such disclosure would “promote the purposes of” the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (“NEPA”), which was adopted months before President Nixon created the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”). [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 7:48 am by Rachel E. VanLandingham
The Supreme Court in its famous 1969 Brandenburg v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 9:44 am by Schachtman
”), aff’d sub nom., Juni v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Bickel’s account – essentially, to emphasize the principles underlying the 14th Amendment and its capacity for growth, rather than how people at the time understood it – is of a piece with one of the ways originalists try to save their approach from generating unacceptable conclusions. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
Excerpt: from Chapter 1, Part VI Conclusion, Personal Reflection by Douglas Elliott, “In Praise of Lawyers”. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:00 pm
After defeats at the lower courts, he won 7-2 at the Supreme Court on February 24, 1969. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 3:00 am by Scott Bomboy
Des Moines Independent Community School District from 1969 and West Virginia v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by msatta
Board of Education or how we got to Obergefell v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Is it the sum of contractual relations among some of the people with stakes in the joint enterprise? [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm by Bill Marler
 The traceback investigation determined that Sea Port Products Corp. imported the scallops that were later supplied to certain Genki Sushi locations in Hawaii, where ill people reported eating. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
This led to an occupation of the site by members of the tribe, with 222 people eventually evicted by police after 506 days. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am by Marty Lederman
On December 24, 1969, Judge Walter Mansfield, to whom the case had been reassigned, wrote as follows: If the Commission in the present case had denied licenses to all applicants convicted of crimes or military offenses, plaintiff would have no valid basis for demanding that a license be issued to him. [read post]