Search for: "People v. Eastman" Results 1 - 20 of 108
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2024, 6:32 am by Mary B. McCord
In March, our team at Georgetown Law’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection—along with our co-counsel at Law Forward and Stafford Rosenbaum, LLP—settled Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 12:57 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
"  Alito renewed that grievance just last month, writing gratuitously after agreeing with the Court's decision not to hear a case involving anti-LGBTQ+ bias that the appellate ruling at hand "exemplifies the danger that I anticipated in Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
I was not surprised by the outcome or even the unanimity of the result in Trump v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am by Daniel J. Gilman
He found that getting prominent real estate on a web browser or mobile phone discourages people from switching to rival search engines. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
California – Judge Finds Eastman Culpable for Ethics Breaches in 2020 Bid to Keep Trump in Power MSN &nd [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 4:24 am by Michael C. Dorf
Our column anticipated that hypocritical lawyers working for Trump would say that the Electoral Count Act is unconstitutional, despite the Supreme Court's reliance on it in Bush v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
By Eric SegallI had an existential crisis in the Spring of 2012, just a few months before the hugely important Affordable Care Act case, NFIB v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 2:25 pm by Ilya Somin
Some of the Georgia co-defendants are the same people as Trump's unindicted co-conspirators from the federal indictment, most notably Rudy Giuliani, Jeffrey Clark, John Eastman, and Sidney Powell. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 2:01 pm by Laurence H. Tribe
And his emails to Eastman and Giuliani subsequently first proposed a Senate hearing “with at least two highly qualified legal scholars concluding that the President of the Senate is solely responsible for counting the votes, and that the Electoral Count Act is unconstitutional in dictating limits on debate and dictating who wins electoral votes when [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:22 pm by Josh Blackman
I have now had a chance to read the entire 45-page indictment in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:42 am by SHG
Oh wait, that was Eastman too. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:00 am by jonathanturley
 That speech is entirely protected under the First Amendment and governing case law, including Brandenburg v. [read post]