Search for: "People v. Fields" Results 1 - 20 of 5,384
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
(Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times) Ryan King, a spokesman for the office of the University of California’s president, Michael V. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:17 am by Phil Dixon
An eyewitness reported that one of the people involved was a dreadlocked Black man. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am by David Pozen
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
This is its newsletter dealing with recent developments  in the field. [read post]
14 May 2024, 3:30 am by Hila Keren
Hila Keren The notorious 1905 Supreme Court decision in Lochner v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
State deficiencies in climate litigations and actions of judges Laurent Fonbaustier / Renaud Braillet  165   Part IV: Cities, States and Climate Change: Between Competition, Conflict and Cooperation Global climate governance turning translocal Delphine Misonne 181   America’s Climate Change Policy: Federalism in Action Daniel Esty  193    Local policies on climate change in a centralized State: The Example of France Camille Mialot  217   … [read post]
10 May 2024, 1:07 pm
(Not that the other had a field day either, obviously.)Divorces sometimes bring out the absolute worst in people, sadly. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:55 am by Mutasim Ali
Second, based on the first conclusion, and as established by the ICJ in Bosnia v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The behavioral economics field gives us principles that suggest the loss of social security benefits will yield strong emotional and/or litigious responses, with the potential for carry-over into the private pension sphere.[7]  To  summarize why this is likely to occur: (1) individuals—using the status quo as their reference point—tend to view change as either a gain or a loss from the status quo; (2) “[s]ince losses loom larger [people feel them… [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Source: USPTO  Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Dismissed Employee Asserts that She Was Terminated Because of Her Age The case of Hall v Zurn Industries Limited involved an employee (“CH”) who began working for Monteco Ltd. on January 18, 2008 as the part-time Director of Human Resources. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Dismissed Employee Asserts that She Was Terminated Because of Her Age The case of Hall v Zurn Industries Limited involved an employee (“CH”) who began working for Monteco Ltd. on January 18, 2008 as the part-time Director of Human Resources. [read post]