Search for: "People v. Frye (1994)"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2018, 6:45 am
Mobil Oil Corp., 7 N.Y.3d 434, 446, 857 N.E.2d 1114 (2006), citing People v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:26 pm
Citing Chief Judge Kaye's concurrence in People v Wesley, the dissent faults the experts' opinions for lacking a proper foundation. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 4:16 pm
Pursuant to the Frye test, expert testimony based on scientific principles or procedures is admissible only after a principle or procedure has gained general acceptance in its specified field (People v Wesley, 83 NY2d 417, 422 [1994]). [read post]
5 May 2007, 1:32 pm
Sod Farms v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:07 am
PROPERTY - HOMEOWNERS - PERSONAL INJURY CLAIM FROM POST-FIRE REMEDIATION WORK - MULTIPLE CHEMICAL SENSITIVITY - FRYE HEARINGO'Brien v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:32 am
People v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am
Frye, Jon M. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 10:48 am
In People v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 6:31 pm
However, admissibility of scientific evidence is generally governed by FRE 702, along with precedent in Frye v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 4:50 pm
” People v. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 11:30 am
” People v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 661 N.E.2d 352, 354 (Ill. 1996); Frye v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
Even some so-called Frye jurisdictions “get it. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:31 am
One example, the appellate decision in Rosen v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
Brock v. [read post]
