Search for: "People v. Gregory (2002)"
Results 1 - 20
of 59
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:24 pm
It is co-authored by Campbell University law professor Gregory Wallace, who has published two articles on "assault weapons," most recently "Assault Weapon" Lethality, 88 Tenn. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Circuit Judge Laurence Silberman’s concurrence in U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
I'd love to hear people's reactions and recommendations, since there's still plenty of time to edit it. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
This post is co-authored by Campbell University law professor Gregory Wallace. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:26 pm
This post is co-authored by Campbell University law professor Gregory Wallace. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:40 pm
The AAPS, on shoddy evidence, jumped on the issue whether abortion causes breast cancer, in 2002, to equate abortion for a teenager as “child abuse,” because the procedure will cause a “30% risk of breast cancer in her lifetime. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac injury, constitute the… [read post]
6 May 2020, 9:12 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 11:15 am
Nov. 4, 2002) (tavern closure due to a bacteria-contaminated water well qualified as direct physical damage to property); Widder v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:06 pm
(See People v. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
Ronald Welsh, Meghan Flanery, Jared Gregory LeBlanc, HOUSTON, TX, for Appellee. [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:47 am
Long post, lots of stuff to cover in this opinion.MillerCoors, LLC v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
It’s overly idealistic to act like, Oh, the Internet is the one place where people should be able to do whatever they wish: present child pornography, do scams, libel people, steal copyrighted material. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:00 am
The government has sought to resolve this tension in this fashion: People who are subject to an entry ban should not be issued a visa, for such an act would be futile. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 6:23 am
Grimshaw v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:34 am
Is there any way that Bayer v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
The state is constituted by the union of people and government, and it is the state that claims against all other states the twin rights of territorial integrity and political sovereignty. . . . [read post]
