Search for: "People v. Hirst" Results 1 - 20 of 56
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am by David Pocklington
The statement of need includes anecdotal information that the Minister of the Baptist congregation, “one of several people who have previously tripped over the legs on the current long benches owing to their awkward design”. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
By Atreya Mathur ​​In a world where creativity knows no bounds and the lines between art, inspiration and infringement blur, one art collective stands at the forefront of pushing these boundaries. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:24 am by centerforartlaw
Clearly a great number of people know who Banksy is and are unwilling to share the information. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am by MATHILDE GROPPO
The proper construction of s 1(1) The background to this issue, and to the enactment of s 1(1), is the judgment in Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC (QB) 1414, in which Tugendhat J considered that there was a “threshold of seriousness” recognised under common law, and in which he favoured a definition that a statement was defamatory if it “… substantially affects in an adverse manner the attitude of other people towards [the… [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Explanatory Notes refer to Thornton (cited above) and Jameel v The Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl [2003] EWCA Civ 1694. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:20 am by Heather Green, University of Aberdeen
  Article 3 of Protocol 1 (A3P1), ECHR – protecting the right to free elections – does not permit blanket bans on prisoner voting in legislative elections (Hirst v UK (No 2) App No.74025/01 (2005);  Scoppola v Italy (No 3) App No. 126/05 (2012)). [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 5:17 am
He thought he ate a fishball,but it was by Damien Hirst --and the formaldehydetasted dreadful ...This week's big event in the IPKat's diary was the IP Publishers and Editors lunch, at which a record crowd was treated to the pleasures of a delightful lunch, a view of Simmons & Simmons' art collection (think Damien Hirst and Tracey Emin) and themed display on social exclusion. [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:31 am by sally
“There has been some discussion on the UK Human Rights Blog about the judgments in the Hirst v UK/Scoppula v Italy cases, the latest of which was given this week. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:47 am by Rosalind English
The Strasbourg authorities including Dickson v United Kingdom [2008] 1 F.L.R. 1315 and Hirst v United Kingdom (2006) 42 E.H.R.R. 41 indicated that Article 8 was engaged whenever a public authority applied a policy which restricted benefits to a particular class of people such as prisoners, and it was important to remember this principle, set out in Hirst and cited in Dickson: Nor is there any place under the Convention system, where tolerance and… [read post]